The Case Against 'AI Wrote My Email for You'
I got an email last week that was clearly AI-written. I deleted it before finishing.
It wasn't badly written. It was perfectly written. And that was the problem. It sounded like no human had ever said these words. It was fluent, professional, and completely forgettable.
That email made me realize: the goal of AI writing tools should be to make you sound better, not to sound like AI.
- Grammatically perfect
- Professional tone
- Sounds like no human wrote it
- Instantly forgettable
- Over-automation backlash
- Still sounds like you
- Clearer and tighter
- Professional without being generic
- Requires your input
The over-automation backlash is real
I've noticed something in the last year: people are getting better at spotting AI writing. And when they spot it, they trust it less.
I got a sales email last month that started with "I hope this message finds you well." I knew immediately it was AI. I deleted it. Not because it was badly written , because it was obviously not written by a human who cared.
The same thing happened with a LinkedIn message, a follow-up email, and a "personal" outreach note. All fluent. All forgettable. All deleted.
There's a growing backlash against AI-written communication. Not because AI writing is bad, but because it's obviously AI. And obvious AI writing signals: "I didn't care enough to write this myself."
Where the line is
I use AI to polish my writing constantly. But there's a line between "AI polished this" and "AI wrote this."
AI wrote this: You gave it a prompt, it generated text, you sent it. No human judgment in the middle.
AI polished this: You wrote it, AI improved it, you reviewed it. Human judgment at every step.
The first one is efficient. The second one is honest.
I dictate my emails. Then I polish with the rewrite palette. Then I read the result. If it doesn't sound like me, I edit it until it does. The AI is a tool, not the author.
Why "AI wrote this" backfires
Here's what I've noticed: AI-written communication has three problems:
1. It's forgettable. Fluent, professional, and instantly forgotten. There's nothing distinctive about it.
2. It signals low effort. When someone can tell AI wrote your message, they assume you didn't care enough to write it yourself.
3. It erodes trust. If everything you write is AI-polished, nothing feels authentic. People start doubting whether anything you say is real.
I've seen this with a colleague. Every email was perfectly written. Every email sounded the same. After a while, I stopped reading them carefully. I assumed they were all AI. The perfect writing became invisible.
AI writing tools should make you sound better, not make you sound like AI. The goal is to sound like a more polished version of yourself , not like a different person. If your reader can tell AI wrote it, you've crossed the line from polish to replacement.
The bottom line
I'm not anti-AI. I build AI writing tools. But I'm against AI writing your communication for you.
Use AI to polish. Use AI to tighten. Use AI to adjust tone. But write the first draft yourself. Review the result. Make sure it sounds like you.
Because the moment your writing sounds like AI wrote it, you've lost the one thing that makes communication work: the sense that a human cares enough to write it.
Try Echo Flow free for 14 days · See the rewrite palette · How to avoid robotic writing
Sources
- Resume.org research: 73% of people can identify AI-generated email, trust it less.
- Writer's own experience: receiving and observing AI-written communication.
- Echo Flow's approach: AI polishes your writing, doesn't replace it.